Novel Measurement for Performance Improvement Challenge
How might we use unconventional methods to measure the improvement of primary health care performance in low- and middle-income countries?
Judges
Dr Luis Gabriel Bernal Pulido
Principal Professor at the School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad de Rosario
Colombia
Dr. Angela Chaudhuri
Director and Member of the Governing Body, Swasti Health Catalyst
Justine Davies
Professor, University of Birmingham
Dr Shivam Gupta
Senior Specialist, Measurement, Monitoring and Evaluation, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
Switzerland
Martin Karanja
Director, GSMA Innovation Fund
Susan Lucas Collins
Global Head of Healthcare Services, Twilio
Dr. Belinda Nimako
Senior Country Engagement & Technical Officer, Primary Health Care Performance Initiative
Dr. Kizito Nsarhaza
Strategic Adviser to the Regional Director/Change Management - Transformation Agenda Implementation, World Health Organization - Africa Region
Julie Rosenberg
Associate Director, Deputy Director, Ariadne Labs, The Global Health Delivery Project at Harvard
Scott Russpatrick
DHIS2 Analytics Product Manager, University of Oslo
Dr. Gloria Seruwagi
Director, Centre for Health and Social Economic Improvement (CHASE-i), Makerere University
Brian Taliesin
Global Director, Living Labs, PATH
Judging Criteria
The judging panel is comprised of cross-sector and proximate leaders from around the world. Judges assess the most promising solutions to the Challenge through several rounds of evaluation.
Judging Criteria
Judges evaluate submitted solutions using the following criteria. Judges assign a numerical score for each criterion from which an average score for each solution is calculated. Each criterion has equal weight. After solutions have been evaluated, a ranked-list of solutions is then created for further consideration by the Judges. Judges deliberate twice: once to select finalists and again to select winners.
Alignment: The solution addresses key dimensions of the Challenge.
Potential for Impact: The planned solution implementation has the potential to impact the intended population.
Feasibility: The team has a realistic, practical plan for implementing the solution, and it is feasible in the given context.
Innovative Approach: The solution includes a new technology, a new application of technology, a new business model, or a new process for solving the Challenge.
Inclusive Human-Centered Design: The solution is designed with and for underserved communities, and the solution team demonstrates proximity to the community and embodies and addresses diversity, equity, and inclusion through their solution.
Scalability: The solution has a plan for financial viability and the potential to be scaled to affect the lives of more people.
Want to learn more about this Challenge? Sign up to receive email updates here.
Submit a Solution
to Top